Supaul
Winner — 1990
A closely fought contest. VIJENDRA PD. YADAV won with a 3.2% margin.
All Candidates
30 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VIJENDRA PD. YADAV | National Front | 48,140 | 35.7% |
| 2 | PARMOD KUMAR SINGH | INC | 43,884 | 32.6% |
| 3 | MOHD. JAHIRUDDIN | IND | 17,286 | 12.8% |
| 4 | AMRENDRA PD. SINGH | JNP(JP) | 11,791 | 8.8% |
| 5 | UMA SHANKER SINGH | IND | 4,193 | 3.1% |
| 6 | DHIRENDER KUMAR | IND | 1,556 | 1.1% |
| 7 | NIRMAL KUMAR NIRALA | IND | 1,381 | 1.0% |
| 8 | MUNSIK MANDAL | IND | 1,014 | 0.8% |
| 9 | SUKDEV SHARMA | IND | 988 | 0.7% |
| 10 | UPENDER THAKUR | IND | 560 | 0.4% |
| 11 | VINDESHWARI YADAV | PBI | 500 | 0.4% |
| 12 | CHHEDI MANDAL | IND | 470 | 0.3% |
| 13 | AMRESH PATHAK | IND | 343 | 0.3% |
| 14 | SHAMBHU KUMAR JAIN | IND | 318 | 0.2% |
| 15 | INDU SHEKHAR CHAUDHARY | IND | 285 | 0.2% |
| 16 | JAMIR ANSARI | IND | 274 | 0.2% |
| 17 | MOHD. ISRAIL | IND | 255 | 0.2% |
| 18 | CHHUTAHARU PASWAN | IND | 231 | 0.2% |
| 19 | RAJENDER YADAV | IND | 216 | 0.2% |
| 20 | LAKHAN SADA | IND | 183 | 0.1% |
| 21 | SANJEEV KUMAR DAS | IND | 149 | 0.1% |
| 22 | DEENA NATH JHA | BKUS | 118 | 0.1% |
| 23 | NAND KISHOR RAJAK | IND | 107 | 0.1% |
| 24 | MOHD. ISLAM | IND | 101 | 0.1% |
| 25 | BHARAT PASWAN | IND | 96 | 0.1% |
| 26 | RAM SHANKER CHAUDHARY | IND | 91 | 0.1% |
| 27 | RAMANAND JHA | IND | 86 | 0.1% |
| 28 | MANJOR ALAM | IND | 57 | 0.0% |
| 29 | NARAYAN MANDAL | IND | 57 | 0.0% |
| 30 | MOHD. ABBAS | IND | 37 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Low turnout (197th), a typical margin, a two-to-three-way race.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
A dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.