Back to Bihar 1990 map
NITI Aspirational District · 2023-24
Bihar · Assembly Constituency 56 · 1990
Kanti
Winner — 1990
NALINI RANJAN SINGH
JD· National Front
JD 25.0%INC 18.0%31 others 57.0%
Votes
20,149
25.0% share
Winning margin
5,683
7.1% of votes
Total candidates
33
Turnout
54.8%
of 1,47,123
A clear win with a 7.1% margin.
Seat history
All Candidates
33 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NALINI RANJAN SINGH | National Front | 20,149 | 25.0% |
| 2 | SHAMBHU SHARAN THAKUR | INC | 14,466 | 18.0% |
| 3 | BALESHWAR RESULPURI | IND | 13,803 | 17.1% |
| 4 | RATNESHWAR PD. SINGH | IND | 6,796 | 8.4% |
| 5 | SHAMSUL HODA | LKD(B) | 3,975 | 4.9% |
| 6 | BHUWNESHWAR RAI | IND | 3,660 | 4.5% |
| 7 | VALI SA. | 3,506 | 4.3% | |
| 8 | RAMKRIPAL SINGH | BJP | 3,367 | 4.2% |
| 9 | LAKSHMI NA SAH | IND | 1,978 | 2.5% |
| 10 | HAROON RASHID | IND | 1,904 | 2.4% |
| 11 | BHUP NARAIN SINGH | 1,505 | 1.9% | |
| 12 | DAHAUR PRASAD GUPTA | BBP | 1,145 | 1.4% |
| 13 | GHANSHYAM JHA | IND | 924 | 1.1% |
| 14 | CHANDESHWAR PASWAN | IND | 634 | 0.8% |
| 15 | SATYA NARAIN SHARMA | JNP(JP) | 536 | 0.7% |
| 16 | SUDHAKAR SHARMA | IND | 436 | 0.5% |
| 17 | NAND KISHORE RAI | IND | 288 | 0.4% |
| 18 | ARVIND KU SHARMA | IND | 201 | 0.3% |
| 19 | SHYAM NA. SINGH | IND | 185 | 0.2% |
| 20 | SIMAL BIHARI SINGH | IND | 184 | 0.2% |
| 21 | SIKANDAR MIA | IND | 151 | 0.2% |
| 22 | SHYAM CHANDRA RAI | IND | 116 | 0.1% |
| 23 | SANJIV KU THAKUR | 109 | 0.1% | |
| 24 | MAHESHWAR MISHRA | IND | 98 | 0.1% |
| 25 | UMESH THAKUR | IND | 94 | 0.1% |
| 26 | GYAN CHANDRA SAH | IND | 93 | 0.1% |
| 27 | AJAY KUMAR | IND | 91 | 0.1% |
| 28 | GARIBNATH THAKUR | IND | 33 | 0.0% |
| 29 | SHYAM NANDAN THAKUR | IND | 30 | 0.0% |
| 30 | VINOD KUMAR THAKUR | IND | 29 | 0.0% |
| 31 | LALITESWAR PD. YADAV | IND | 22 | 0.0% |
| 32 | UMASHANKAR SINGH | IND | 21 | 0.0% |
| 33 | SUKDEV SAH | IND | 20 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
High turnout (29th), a comfortable margin, a fragmented field.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
safe7.1%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 19.1% · min 0.3% · max 56.8%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
74%
lowerhigher
29th of 243How crowded is the field?
SEAT
3.19
fewer partiesmore parties
29th of 243How much NOTA?
SEAT
1.4%
lowerhigher
163rd of 243Where does the house stand?
SEAT
324 seats · 163 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
3.19EFFECTIVE PARTIES
JD 25.0%INC 18.0%IND 17.1%IND 8.4%OTH 31.5%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
32,64,619
Density
1011 / km²
Sex ratio
921 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
3,229 km²
SC population12.0%
ST population4.3%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
61%HINDU
Hindu 60.9%Muslim 38.5%Other 0.6%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water2.0%
Electricity13.4%
Sanitation13.7%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births68.9%
Children fully vaccinated62.7%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER43.5%
Children underweight (under 5)47.1%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER66.0%
Women literate47.5%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER51.2%
Clean cooking fuel19.3%
Health insurance10.2%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Bamboo Art🏺Jute🏺Makhana (Foxnut)
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.