Back to Bihar 1995 map
NITI Aspirational District · 2023-24
Bihar · Assembly Constituency 170 · 1995
Bihpur
Winner — 1995
BARHMDEO MANDAL
JD· Janata Dal
JD 38.5%INC 20.3%28 others 41.2%
Votes
36,393
38.5% share
Winning margin
17,153
18.1% of votes
Total candidates
30
Turnout
59.7%
of 1,58,473
Bihpur is a safe seat — BARHMDEO MANDAL won by 18.1%.
Seat history
All Candidates
30 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BARHMDEO MANDAL | Janata Dal | 36,393 | 38.5% |
| 2 | AJIT SHARMA | INC | 19,240 | 20.4% |
| 3 | BALBHADRA CHOUDHARY | BJP | 18,632 | 19.7% |
| 4 | KUSHESHWAR KUMAR | BPP | 6,119 | 6.5% |
| 5 | USHA DEVI | 3,344 | 3.5% | |
| 6 | MD. JAHIDA | SOP(L) | 2,593 | 2.7% |
| 7 | MADAN MOHAN GUPTA | Samajwadi Party | 1,602 | 1.7% |
| 8 | VINOD KUMAR SINGH | IND | 1,531 | 1.6% |
| 9 | PARMANAND MANDAL | SJP(R) | 770 | 0.8% |
| 10 | BAL KRISHNA RAJHANS | IND | 639 | 0.7% |
| 11 | CHHANGURI MANDAL | IND | 519 | 0.6% |
| 12 | GAYA YADAV | IND | 402 | 0.4% |
| 13 | JAI NR. YADAV | IND | 324 | 0.3% |
| 14 | MEHTA SACHIDANAND PRASAD | 323 | 0.3% | |
| 15 | NARENDRAKUMAR MANDAL | IND | 281 | 0.3% |
| 16 | MAHABIR PODDAR | IND | 263 | 0.3% |
| 17 | SHYAMANAND GUPTA | IND | 226 | 0.2% |
| 18 | SHAHBAJ | IND | 208 | 0.2% |
| 19 | BAIJNATH SINGH | IND | 203 | 0.2% |
| 20 | JAGDISH MANDAL | IND | 122 | 0.1% |
| 21 | JANARDAN MANDAL | IND | 121 | 0.1% |
| 22 | SUKDEO MANDAL | IND | 114 | 0.1% |
| 23 | MURLI SINGH | IND | 111 | 0.1% |
| 24 | CHANDRADEO MANDAL | IND | 99 | 0.1% |
| 25 | GOPAL MISHRA | IND | 73 | 0.1% |
| 26 | NIRANJAN KR. RAY | IND | 70 | 0.1% |
| 27 | RAM RAMAN PATEL | IND | 67 | 0.1% |
| 28 | AJIT KUMAR JHA | IND | 63 | 0.1% |
| 29 | SHIVNANDAN CHOUDHARY | IND | 58 | 0.1% |
| 30 | GOPAL MEHTA | IND | 36 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Low turnout (199th), a comfortable margin, a fragmented field.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean18.1%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 13.1% · min 0.1% · max 33.9%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
62%
lowerhigher
199th of 243How crowded is the field?
SEAT
3.46
fewer partiesmore parties
14th of 243How much NOTA?
SEAT
4.3%
lowerhigher
2nd of 243Where does the house stand?
SEAT
324 seats · 163 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
3.46EFFECTIVE PARTIES
JD 38.5%INC 20.4%BJP 19.7%BPP 6.5%OTH 15.0%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
6,36,342
Density
924 / km²
Sex ratio
930 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
689 km²
SC population20.6%
ST population0.1%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
94%HINDU
Hindu 93.7%Muslim 5.9%Other 0.4%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water4.9%
Electricity19.3%
Sanitation28.9%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births89.2%
Children fully vaccinated82.8%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER53.6%
Children underweight (under 5)37.6%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER69.5%
Women literate55.0%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER46.1%
Clean cooking fuel40.3%
Health insurance9.7%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Onion
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.