Back to Bihar 1995 map
NITI Aspirational District · 2023-24
Bihar · Assembly Constituency 236 · 1995
Nabinagar
Winner — 1995
VIRENDRA KUMAR SINGH
JD· Janata Dal
JD 28.5%INC 15.8%28 others 55.7%
Votes
28,914
28.5% share
Winning margin
12,917
12.7% of votes
Total candidates
30
Turnout
55.5%
of 1,82,922
A clear win with a 12.7% margin.
Seat history
All Candidates
30 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VIRENDRA KUMAR SINGH | Janata Dal | 28,914 | 28.5% |
| 2 | RAGHUVANSH PRASAD SINGH | INC | 15,997 | 15.8% |
| 3 | VINDESHWARI PRASAD SINGH | BPP | 13,918 | 13.7% |
| 4 | BHEEM KUMAR | IND | 9,924 | 9.8% |
| 5 | SANTAN PRASAD SINGH | 7,717 | 7.6% | |
| 6 | NARESH SINGH | 7,321 | 7.2% | |
| 7 | RAMDAS SINGH | BJP | 4,763 | 4.7% |
| 8 | RAM SWARUP SINGH YADAV | CPI(ML)(L) | 3,361 | 3.3% |
| 9 | RAMLAKHAN PRASAD SINGH | IND | 2,590 | 2.5% |
| 10 | UPENDRA KUMAR SINGH | Samajwadi Party | 947 | 0.9% |
| 11 | KAMESHWAR MEHTA | IND | 586 | 0.6% |
| 12 | ARVIND KUMAR SINGH | IND | 549 | 0.5% |
| 13 | NAND KESHWAR RAM | IND | 487 | 0.5% |
| 14 | NAGENDRA SINGH | IND | 478 | 0.5% |
| 15 | MAHAMAYA SINGH | IND | 377 | 0.4% |
| 16 | JAGNATH SINGH | 361 | 0.4% | |
| 17 | RAM SHISH RAM | IND | 348 | 0.3% |
| 18 | RAM BRIKSHA BHAGAT | IND | 323 | 0.3% |
| 19 | SURAYA DEV SINGH | IND | 301 | 0.3% |
| 20 | JAYNATH TIWARI | IND | 297 | 0.3% |
| 21 | SYAM NARAYAN YADAV | IND | 260 | 0.3% |
| 22 | UDAY KUMAR SINGH | IND | 246 | 0.2% |
| 23 | RAMVIGESHWAR SINGH | BKUS | 238 | 0.2% |
| 24 | DACHHAN SINGH | IND | 232 | 0.2% |
| 25 | JAYRAM SINGH | IND | 208 | 0.2% |
| 26 | NAND LAL SINGH | IND | 173 | 0.2% |
| 27 | RAMNARESH VAIDYA | IND | 168 | 0.2% |
| 28 | SATENDRA KUMAR SINGH | IND | 156 | 0.1% |
| 29 | NARENDRA SINGH | IND | 136 | 0.1% |
| 30 | HARDEV SINGH | IND | 104 | 0.1% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Low turnout (226th), a typical margin, a fragmented field.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean12.7%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 13.1% · min 0.3% · max 41.6%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
59%
lowerhigher
226th of 243How crowded is the field?
SEAT
3.18
fewer partiesmore parties
30th of 243How much NOTA?
SEAT
2.3%
lowerhigher
59th of 243Where does the house stand?
SEAT
324 seats · 163 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
3.18EFFECTIVE PARTIES
JD 28.5%INC 15.8%BPP 13.7%IND 9.8%SAP 7.6%BSP 7.2%OTH 17.4%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
22,19,146
Density
890 / km²
Sex ratio
939 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
2,494 km²
SC population25.5%
ST population0.1%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
89%HINDU
Hindu 88.5%Muslim 11.0%Other 0.5%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water2.9%
Electricity9.0%
Sanitation22.3%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births79.9%
Children fully vaccinated74.5%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER49.4%
Children underweight (under 5)37.3%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER70.4%
Women literate62.1%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER43.3%
Clean cooking fuel40.7%
Health insurance8.1%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Handloom🏺Magahi Paan/ Betel Vine
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.