Back to Bihar 1995 map
Bihar · Assembly Constituency 72 · 1995
Pupri
Winner — 1995
SITARAM YADAV
JD· Janata Dal
JD 48.8%SAP 30.6%29 others 20.6%
Votes
50,184
48.8% share
Winning margin
18,707
18.2% of votes
Total candidates
31
Turnout
51.7%
of 1,98,812
Pupri is a safe seat — SITARAM YADAV won by 18.2%.
Seat history
All Candidates
31 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SITARAM YADAV | Janata Dal | 50,184 | 48.8% |
| 2 | RAM BRIKSHA CHOUDHARY | 31,477 | 30.6% | |
| 3 | BINDA PRASAD SINGH | BJP | 4,344 | 4.2% |
| 4 | RAM BUJHABAN YADAV | INC | 4,321 | 4.2% |
| 5 | INDRESH KUMAR | IND | 1,976 | 1.9% |
| 6 | JAI PRAKASH THAKUR | BPP | 1,879 | 1.8% |
| 7 | RAM JATAN ROY | JP | 1,364 | 1.3% |
| 8 | NAGENDRA NARAYAN JHA | Samajwadi Party | 1,100 | 1.1% |
| 9 | SITARAM MAHTO | SOP(L) | 965 | 0.9% |
| 10 | MANOJ KUMAR SINGH | IND | 733 | 0.7% |
| 11 | AIDEO ROY | IND | 489 | 0.5% |
| 12 | RAM NARESH CHOUDHARY | IND | 356 | 0.3% |
| 13 | DEO NARAYAN ROY | IND | 348 | 0.3% |
| 14 | RAM RATAN YADAV | IND | 336 | 0.3% |
| 15 | NAND KUMAR ROY | IND | 314 | 0.3% |
| 16 | MAHANTH RAJEEV RANJAN DAS | SJP(R) | 281 | 0.3% |
| 17 | EKWAL MD. SAMI | IND | 254 | 0.3% |
| 18 | AJAY KUMAR CHOUDHARY | IND | 236 | 0.2% |
| 19 | BALI RAM PANDAY | IND | 223 | 0.2% |
| 20 | BIRENDRA SINGH | IND | 213 | 0.2% |
| 21 | MAHESHWAR SAH | IND | 199 | 0.2% |
| 22 | LAL MANDAL | IND | 198 | 0.2% |
| 23 | ASHOK KUMAR THAKUR | IND | 182 | 0.2% |
| 24 | DEVENDRA ROY | IND | 153 | 0.1% |
| 25 | YASHWANT ROY | IND | 141 | 0.1% |
| 26 | RAJ MANGAL ROY | IND | 131 | 0.1% |
| 27 | RAVINDRA MISHRA | IND | 129 | 0.1% |
| 28 | ANIL KUMAR THAKUR | IND | 112 | 0.1% |
| 29 | MD. SHAKIL AHMAD | IND | 85 | 0.1% |
| 30 | ARUN KUMAR CHOUDHARY | IND | 74 | 0.1% |
| 31 | MD. SAUD AIAM | IND | 64 | 0.1% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (96th), a closer-than-average contest, a two-to-three-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean18.2%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 12.9% · min 0.8% · max 29.9%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
70%
lowerhigher
96th of 243How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.38
fewer partiesmore parties
191st of 243How much NOTA?
SEAT
2.6%
lowerhigher
38th of 243Where does the house stand?
SEAT
324 seats · 163 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.38EFFECTIVE PARTIES
JD 48.8%SAP 30.6%OTH 20.6%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
20,01,762
Density
1120 / km²
Sex ratio
911 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
1,788 km²
SC population17.3%
ST population0.6%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
88%HINDU
Hindu 87.6%Muslim 12.1%Other 0.3%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water1.6%
Electricity5.8%
Sanitation13.1%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births75.0%
Children fully vaccinated72.0%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER46.3%
Children underweight (under 5)43.5%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER65.7%
Women literate47.6%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER52.0%
Clean cooking fuel13.4%
Health insurance9.5%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Bamboo Art🏺Mango
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.