Darauli
Winner — 2005 (Feb)
Darauli was decided by a razor-thin margin of 1.9% — fewer than 1,573 votes separated winner from runner-up.
All Candidates
13 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMAR NATH YADAV | CPI(ML)(L) CPI(ML)(L) | 25,197 | 30.1% |
| 2 | SHEO SHANKER YADAV | 23,624 | 28.2% | |
| 3 | RAJDEO SINGH | NDA | 15,868 | 19.0% |
| 4 | SHRINIWASH YADAV | IND | 4,922 | 5.9% |
| 5 | KRISHNA PRATAP SINGH | IND | 3,269 | 3.9% |
| 6 | SRI LAKHI CHAND PRASAD YADAV | BSP | 1,806 | 2.2% |
| 7 | ABHA DEVI | IND | 1,805 | 2.2% |
| 8 | DURGA PRASAD SINGH | 1,738 | 2.1% | |
| 9 | YOGENDRA PRASAD YADAV | 1,397 | 1.7% | |
| 10 | KRISHNA MURARI RAI | IND | 1,391 | 1.7% |
| 11 | RAMPRIT GOND | IND | 1,258 | 1.5% |
| 12 | PANCHA NAND SINGH | IND | 767 | 0.9% |
| 13 | UTTAM BIHARI KUSHWAHA | IND | 664 | 0.8% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (149th), a comfortable margin, a fragmented field.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
A dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.