Bikram
Winner — 2010
Bikram was decided by a razor-thin margin of 1.8% — fewer than 2,352 votes separated winner from runner-up.
5 of 16 declare criminal cases · median assets ₹0.21 Cr — cases registered, not convictions
All Candidates
16 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ANIL KUMAR | NDA (NDA) | 38,965 | 29.6% |
| 2 | SIDDHARTH | 36,613 | 27.8% | |
| 3 | RAM JANAM SHARMA | IND | 11,812 | 9.0% |
| 4 | PANCHAM KUMAR | BSP | 11,264 | 8.6% |
| 5 | SUBHASH PRASAD YADAV | IND | 9,974 | 7.6% |
| 6 | LEELA VERMA | CPI(ML)(L) CPI(ML)(L) | 4,004 | 3.0% |
| 7 | SANJEEV SINGH | INC | 3,254 | 2.5% |
| 8 | AJAY KUMAR | IND | 3,030 | 2.3% |
| 9 | MD. IBRAHIM | 2,708 | 2.1% | |
| 10 | BIRENDRA PRASAD | INGP | 2,562 | 1.9% |
| 11 | VAIKUNTHA MANJHI | IND | 2,040 | 1.6% |
| 12 | RANA RAJU PRATAP SINGH | IJK | 1,963 | 1.5% |
| 13 | RAGHWENDRA PRASAD | IND | 1,089 | 0.8% |
| 14 | SATISH KUMAR URF RAJU | 1,049 | 0.8% | |
| 15 | ARJUN PRASAD | 811 | 0.6% | |
| 16 | RANDHIR KUMAR | 634 | 0.5% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Average turnout (98th), a closer-than-average contest, a two-to-three-way race.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
declare criminal cases
median assets ₹0.21 Cr
A dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
1 locationLandmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.