Sheohar
Winner — 2010
Sheohar was decided by a razor-thin margin of 1.4% — fewer than 1,631 votes separated winner from runner-up.
3 of 15 declare criminal cases · median assets ₹0.44 Cr — cases registered, not convictions
All Candidates
15 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHARFUDDIN | NDA (NDA) | 40,447 | 33.7% |
| 2 | PRATIMA DEVI | BSP | 38,816 | 32.4% |
| 3 | AJIT KUMAR JHA | 24,838 | 20.7% | |
| 4 | KAMALESH KUMAR SINGH | INC | 2,690 | 2.2% |
| 5 | RAJESH KUMAR SINGH | IND | 2,065 | 1.7% |
| 6 | MD. HABIBULAH | IND | 1,910 | 1.6% |
| 7 | SHATRUGHNA SAHU | 1,583 | 1.3% | |
| 8 | SANJAY PRASAD | IND | 1,426 | 1.2% |
| 9 | GAGANDEO RAM | IND | 1,207 | 1.0% |
| 10 | RAJIV KUMAR SINGH | IND | 1,074 | 0.9% |
| 11 | SURESH KUMAR SINGH | IND | 1,073 | 0.9% |
| 12 | SANJAY KUMAR SINGH | IND | 775 | 0.7% |
| 13 | MD. ZULFAQAR ANWAR | IND | 749 | 0.6% |
| 14 | MD. NASRUDDIN ANSARI | IND | 692 | 0.6% |
| 15 | JAY PRAKASH SHARMA | IND | 593 | 0.5% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Average turnout (108th), a comfortable margin, a fragmented field.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
declare criminal cases
median assets ₹0.44 Cr
A dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.