Pranpur
Winner — 2010
Pranpur was decided by a razor-thin margin of 0.5% — fewer than 716 votes separated winner from runner-up.
4 of 16 declare criminal cases · median assets ₹0.08 Cr — cases registered, not convictions
All Candidates
16 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BINOD KUMAR SINGH | NDA (NDA) | 43,660 | 31.6% |
| 2 | ISRAT PARWEEN | 42,944 | 31.1% | |
| 3 | ABDUL JALIL | INC | 13,925 | 10.1% |
| 4 | MAHENDRA NARAYAN YADAV | 12,915 | 9.3% | |
| 5 | SUDARSHAN CHANDRA PAL | IND | 10,083 | 7.3% |
| 6 | SAHIRUDDIN | IND | 3,544 | 2.6% |
| 7 | SUBHASH CHANDRA MANDAL | IND | 2,313 | 1.7% |
| 8 | RAJ KUMAR MANDAL | IND | 1,836 | 1.3% |
| 9 | SATYENDRA SHARMA | BSP | 1,599 | 1.2% |
| 10 | PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH | IND | 1,551 | 1.1% |
| 11 | ZAKEER HUSSAIN | IND | 939 | 0.7% |
| 12 | EZAZ | IND | 806 | 0.6% |
| 13 | SHAKIL ANJUM | 567 | 0.4% | |
| 14 | ABDUS SALAM | CPI(ML)(L) CPI(ML)(L) | 545 | 0.4% |
| 15 | JAWED RAHI | IND | 535 | 0.4% |
| 16 | ABDUL RAHMAN | BMF | 464 | 0.3% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
High turnout (4th), a closer-than-average contest, a two-to-three-way race.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
declare criminal cases
median assets ₹0.08 Cr
A dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.