Munger
Winner — 2020
Munger was decided by a razor-thin margin of 0.8% — fewer than 1,244 votes separated winner from runner-up.
6 of 15 declare criminal cases · median assets ₹0.25 Cr — cases registered, not convictions
All Candidates
16 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PRANAV KUMAR | NDA (NDA) | 75,573 | 45.7% |
| 2 | AVINASH KUMAR VIDYARTHI | 74,329 | 45.0% | |
| 3 | SHALINI KUMARI | IND | 4,497 | 2.7% |
| — | NOTA | NOTA | 3,076 | 1.9% |
| 5 | KANCHAN KUMARI | IND | 1,358 | 0.8% |
| 6 | SUBODH VERMA | 1,325 | 0.8% | |
| 7 | VIKAS KUMAR | IND | 1,292 | 0.8% |
| 8 | MD MOKIM | 838 | 0.5% | |
| 9 | MANOJ KUMAR PATEL | BHRTSBLP | 610 | 0.4% |
| 10 | ROHIT KUMAR | IND | 555 | 0.3% |
| 11 | JAMUNA LAL SRIVASTAVA | BRRTD | 391 | 0.2% |
| 12 | ADITYA SINGH MADHUKAR | IND | 374 | 0.2% |
| 13 | AWADHESH KUMAR YADAV | IND | 285 | 0.2% |
| 14 | DEVANAND MANDAL | 259 | 0.2% | |
| 15 | MOHMMAD FAISAL AHMAD | JAPL | 249 | 0.1% |
| 16 | SADDAM KHAN | AJPS | 205 | 0.1% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Low turnout (202nd), a typical margin, an essentially two-way race.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
declare criminal cases
median assets ₹0.25 Cr
A dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.