Pipra
Winner — 2020
A closely fought contest. SHYAMBABU PRASAD YADAV won with a 4.1% margin.
9 of 15 declare criminal cases · median assets ₹0.66 Cr — cases registered, not convictions
All Candidates
16 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHYAMBABU PRASAD YADAV | NDA (NDA) | 88,587 | 44.2% |
| 2 | RAJMANGAL PRASAD | 80,410 | 40.1% | |
| 3 | AWADHESH Pd KUSHWAHA | IND | 6,940 | 3.5% |
| — | NOTA | NOTA | 6,344 | 3.2% |
| 5 | SHYAM NANDAN KUMAR | IND | 3,694 | 1.8% |
| 6 | SUBHASH SINGH KUSHWAHA | 3,243 | 1.6% | |
| 7 | ANIKET RANJAN | RJnJnP | 2,852 | 1.4% |
| 8 | MD. MUMTAZ ALAM | IND | 2,185 | 1.1% |
| 9 | ANKUSH KUMAR SINGH | JAPL | 1,233 | 0.6% |
| 10 | ASHOK KUMAR SUMAN | IND | 1,085 | 0.5% |
| 11 | RAMCHANDRA SAH | RJBP | 884 | 0.4% |
| 12 | TUPTI KUMARI | JDR | 689 | 0.3% |
| 13 | AFZAL | IND | 671 | 0.3% |
| 14 | RANI KUMARI | SWAP | 572 | 0.3% |
| 15 | LALIT KUMAR SINGH | BMUP | 557 | 0.3% |
| 16 | AJAY KUMAR SHUKLA | IND | 555 | 0.3% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
High turnout (47th), a closer-than-average contest, a two-to-three-way race.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
declare criminal cases
median assets ₹0.66 Cr
A dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
1 locationLandmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.