Back to Maharashtra 1995 map
Maharashtra · Assembly Constituency 166 · 1995
Pusad
Winner — 1995
NAIK MANOHARRAO RAJUSING
INC· INC
INC 46.6%JD 45.0%28 others 8.4%
Votes
63,732
46.6% share
Winning margin
2,118
1.6% of votes
Total candidates
30
Turnout
75.7%
of 1,80,728
Pusad was decided by a razor-thin margin of 1.6% — fewer than 2,118 votes separated winner from runner-up.
Seat history
All Candidates
30 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NAIK MANOHARRAO RAJUSING | INC | 63,732 | 46.6% |
| 2 | MUKHARE NARENDRA GODHAJIRAO | Janata Dal | 61,614 | 45.0% |
| 3 | PULATE KESHAORAO LAXMAN | 2,080 | 1.5% | |
| 4 | CHAUDHARI DNYANDEO VEDU | 1,690 | 1.2% | |
| 5 | BABUSING SHIORAM PAWAR | IND | 1,195 | 0.9% |
| 6 | DHUMAL NADKISHOR VITTHALRAO | IND | 1,099 | 0.8% |
| 7 | BOKE VISHWANATH KISAN | IND | 1,007 | 0.7% |
| 8 | RATHOD SHANKAR VASRAM | 649 | 0.5% | |
| 9 | POLKAT NATHURAM PURUSHOTTAM | IND | 644 | 0.5% |
| 10 | GAIKWAD DHARMA KISAN | IND | 445 | 0.3% |
| 11 | KESHAO GAJANAN OZARKAR | IND | 421 | 0.3% |
| 12 | BABANRAO NARAYAN VYAVHARE | IND | 269 | 0.2% |
| 13 | PAIKRAOSHYAMSUNDAR CHOKHAJI | IND | 224 | 0.2% |
| 14 | BHOYAR SURESH BAPURAO | IND | 224 | 0.2% |
| 15 | RAUT DEVENDRA PUNDLIKRAO | IND | 166 | 0.1% |
| 16 | RATHOD GANPAT RATNA | IND | 130 | 0.1% |
| 17 | SHILANAND LAXMAN KAMBLE | IND | 128 | 0.1% |
| 18 | MO. INAMURRAHIM MO. MUSA | IND | 122 | 0.1% |
| 19 | RAJARAM ANSING CHAVHAN | IND | 113 | 0.1% |
| 20 | PATIL PANDURANG CHANDBARAO | IND | 112 | 0.1% |
| 21 | PAIKRAO VISHWANATH FAKIRA | IND | 96 | 0.1% |
| 22 | BODKHE BHURAO APPAJI | IND | 95 | 0.1% |
| 23 | SHRIRAM MOTIRAM ADE | IND | 94 | 0.1% |
| 24 | ADHAV MADHAORAO SAMBHAJI | IND | 90 | 0.1% |
| 25 | DHAGE PANDURANG DEMAJI | IND | 87 | 0.1% |
| 26 | KAKADE SARJERAO GANPATRAO | IND | 85 | 0.1% |
| 27 | SARDAR PANDURANG MAHIPATRAO | IND | 85 | 0.1% |
| 28 | NAIK SUDHAKARRAO SHANKAR | IND | 80 | 0.1% |
| 29 | VINAYAK DAULATRAO GUJAR | IND | 45 | 0.0% |
| 30 | SATHE KRISHNARAO SAWALA | IND | 36 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (226th), a typical margin, an essentially two-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
safe1.6%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 16.7% · min 1.6% · max 37.9%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
59%
lowerhigher
226th of 288How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.11
fewer partiesmore parties
225th of 288How much NOTA?
SEAT
1.4%
lowerhigher
26th of 288Where does the house stand?
SEAT
288 seats · 145 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.11EFFECTIVE PARTIES
INC 46.6%JD 45.0%OTH 8.4%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — more literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
93,56,962
Density
20980 / km²
Sex ratio
860 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
446 km²
SC population6.2%
ST population1.1%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
68%HINDU
Hindu 67.7%Muslim 19.2%Buddhist 5.0%Other 8.1%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water96.5%
Electricity96.9%
Sanitation54.7%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births98.1%
Children fully vaccinated— NOT REPORTED
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER37.2%
Children underweight (under 5)24.6%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER50.0%
Women literate91.6%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER10.0%
Clean cooking fuel98.7%
Health insurance20.2%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Gems & Jewellery🏺Marine Produce
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.