Sundargarh
Winner — 1951
Sundargarh was decided by a razor-thin margin of 1.8% — fewer than 1,848 votes separated winner from runner-up.
All Candidates
10 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRUPANIDHI NAIK | 18,212 | 17.6% | |
| 2 | HARIHAR PATEL | 16,364 | 15.8% | |
| 3 | DWARIKANATH KUSUM | 16,330 | 15.7% | |
| 4 | DAITARI TANTI | 15,828 | 15.3% | |
| 5 | RANGABALLAV AMAT | IND | 13,221 | 12.7% |
| 6 | NIRODA GOPAL GOSWAMI | IND | 10,745 | 10.3% |
| 7 | MUNU PANA | IND | 3,400 | 3.3% |
| 8 | JAYADEB PAN | IND | 3,319 | 3.2% |
| 9 | UGRASEN PURUSETH | 3,287 | 3.2% | |
| 10 | GUSTALI MUNDA | IND | 3,089 | 3.0% |
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (82nd), a closer-than-average contest, a two-to-three-way race.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
A moderately populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.