Bhangar
Winner — 1951
Bhangar was decided by a razor-thin margin of 1.6% — fewer than 1,507 votes separated winner from runner-up.
All Candidates
11 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HEMCHANDRA NASKAR | 16,943 | 17.8% | |
| 2 | GANGADHAR NASKAR | 16,176 | 17.0% | |
| 3 | KHAGENDRA KUMAR ROY CHOUDHURY | 15,436 | 16.2% | |
| 4 | MOZAMEL HOSSAIN SHAIK | IND | 12,347 | 12.9% |
| 5 | HRIDOY BHUSAN CHAKRAVORTY | 11,970 | 12.6% | |
| 6 | HARI KUMAR CHAKRAVORTY | IND | 5,973 | 6.3% |
| 7 | SHAHADAT ALI | IND | 4,500 | 4.7% |
| 8 | ANANTA KUMAR ROY SARDAR | 4,179 | 4.4% | |
| 9 | KISHORI MOHAN BHATTACHARJEE | 3,939 | 4.1% | |
| 10 | RAJANI KANTO NASKAR | IND | 2,095 | 2.2% |
| 11 | HARIDAS MONDAL | IND | 1,790 | 1.9% |
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (62nd), a typical margin, a two-to-three-way race.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
A dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
6 locationsLandmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.
