Back to Uttar Pradesh 1991 map
Uttar Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 121 · 1991
Amethi
Winner — 1991
HARI CHARAN YADAV
INC· INC
INC 48.7%BJP 25.8%31 others 25.5%
Votes
33,176
48.7% share
Winning margin
15,579
22.9% of votes
Total candidates
33
Turnout
36.8%
of 1,85,076
Amethi is a safe seat — HARI CHARAN YADAV won by 22.9%.
Seat history
All Candidates
33 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HARI CHARAN YADAV | INC | 33,176 | 48.7% |
| 2 | JAMUNA PRASAD MISHRA | BJP | 17,597 | 25.8% |
| 3 | JAI BAHADUR SINGH | Janata Dal | 6,065 | 8.9% |
| 4 | RAGHAW RAM | JP | 3,683 | 5.4% |
| 5 | RAM KARAN JAISWAL | IND | 724 | 1.1% |
| 6 | RAM GULAM | IND | 675 | 1.0% |
| 7 | DARGAHI SHAHU | IND | 565 | 0.8% |
| 8 | SRI RAM | IND | 493 | 0.7% |
| 9 | RAM KRIPAL | IND | 465 | 0.7% |
| 10 | MOTI LAL | IND | 454 | 0.7% |
| 11 | CHHOTE LAL | IND | 422 | 0.6% |
| 12 | RAM KARAN | IND | 418 | 0.6% |
| 13 | SAHURI | IND | 379 | 0.6% |
| 14 | RAM PIYARE YADAV | IND | 259 | 0.4% |
| 15 | SHANT KUMAR ALIAS SANT KUMAR PANDEY | IND | 256 | 0.4% |
| 16 | SHALENDRA | IND | 253 | 0.4% |
| 17 | RAM DAS | IND | 239 | 0.3% |
| 18 | DEO NARAIN | IND | 228 | 0.3% |
| 19 | RAMA PATI YADAV ALIAS PUJARI | IND | 212 | 0.3% |
| 20 | HAUSHILA | IND | 209 | 0.3% |
| 21 | GAJADHAR | IND | 178 | 0.3% |
| 22 | JAGDISH SINGH | IND | 162 | 0.2% |
| 23 | LAL BIHARI | IND | 154 | 0.2% |
| 24 | KALI DIN | IND | 124 | 0.2% |
| 25 | KALIKA | IND | 123 | 0.2% |
| 26 | MURLIDHAR KORI | IND | 111 | 0.2% |
| 27 | RAM SAMUJH PAL | IND | 101 | 0.1% |
| 28 | BABU LAL | IND | 82 | 0.1% |
| 29 | VED NARAYAN TRIPATHI | IND | 81 | 0.1% |
| 30 | SANKATHA PRASAD | IND | 81 | 0.1% |
| 31 | LAHURI DAS GAUTAM | IND | 64 | 0.1% |
| 32 | RAM SINGH | IND | 64 | 0.1% |
| 33 | NAGENDRA PRASAD | IND | 48 | 0.1% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
High turnout (49th), a closer-than-average contest, a two-to-three-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
safe22.9%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 18.4% · min 2.4% · max 97.0%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
68%
lowerhigher
49th of 403How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.32
fewer partiesmore parties
355th of 403How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.6%
lowerhigher
200th of 403Where does the house stand?
SEAT
419 seats · 210 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.32EFFECTIVE PARTIES
INC 48.7%BJP 25.8%JD 8.9%JP 5.4%OTH 11.2%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
44,48,359
Density
1080 / km²
Sex ratio
887 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
4,120 km²
SC population12.5%
ST population0.1%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
64%HINDU
Hindu 63.6%Muslim 34.5%Other 1.8%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water43.4%
Electricity36.6%
Sanitation62.0%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births75.1%
Children fully vaccinated70.5%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER45.9%
Children underweight (under 5)35.2%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER60.8%
Women literate53.9%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER11.4%
Clean cooking fuel54.6%
Health insurance18.7%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Bamboo Products🏺Goldsmith Industry🏺Zari and Zardozi
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.